ACC Player of the Year and Coach of the Year

**CoeburnCane** · March 9th, 2010, 02:58 PM

I wouldn't call Vasquez a slam dunk choice, as has been discussed on here. Could have went to either Scheyer or Delaney given the #'s and what they meant to their teams. It's a tough call between 3 really good players.

I'll give you Williams as COY though. I honestly didn't expect Maryland to be as competitive as they were this year, earning a split of the ACC regular season w/Duke. He did a helluva job with what he's got on that team.

I'll be interested to see who finishes 2nd behind Favors in ROY voting. I think Durand Scott has to be the next best Freshman behind him.

**pvfan** · March 9th, 2010, 03:29 PM

It was a slam dunk, Vasquez owns Scheyer in every statstically category except turnovers and their assist to turnover ratio is equal. Jordan Williams was second in freshman of the year voting. Vasquez took home over 70% of the vote for ACC Player of the Year.

**CoeburnCane** · March 9th, 2010, 06:07 PM

Originally Posted by pvfan

It was a slam dunk, Vasquez owns Scheyer in every statstically category except turnovers and their assist to turnover ratio is equal. Jordan Williams was second in freshman of the year voting. Vasquez took home over 70% of the vote for ACC Player of the Year.

I'll simply disagree b/c nothing I could say that's rational would come close to changing your mind. They're Twerps, they're the greatest EVAR. All hail. :mooning:

**pvfan** · March 9th, 2010, 06:20 PM

I'd go with that if I were you as well since no stats are close when comparing Vasquez vs. Scheyer in ACC Play. Keep on loving K.

**CoeburnCane** · March 10th, 2010, 09:19 AM

Originally Posted by pvfan

I'd go with that if I were you as well since no stats seen through my red/yellow/black/white/random colored glasses are close when comparing Vasquez vs. Scheyer in ACC Play. Keep on loving K.

Amended for truthfulness.

**pvfan** · March 10th, 2010, 10:52 AM

It always makes me feel good when you do this, it means I'm right because you have no statistical information or merit to stand on. Please continue embarrassing yourself if you wish.

**CoeburnCane** · March 10th, 2010, 01:15 PM

Originally Posted by pvfan

It always makes me feel good when you do this, it means I'm right because you have no statistically information or merit to stand on. Please continue embarrassing yourself if you wish.

Do what? Point out your bias that shows you wouldn't look at the stats rationally even if I posted them? That embarrasses me terribly. Poor me.

I'm just saying I ain't gonna waste my time speaking rationally to a biased brick wall.